There Is No ‘Right’ or ‘Left,’ Only Right or Wrong

Ecclesiastes 10:2

One of the most misleading and dangerous words that all sane people need to exercise caution with—if not do away with altogether—is the “Left.”

Why? Because it bestows legitimacy on insanity and worse.

In current discourse, the Left and Right are seen as polar opposites on a continuum of political views.  Imagine a horizontal line:  the further right one goes, the more conservative, religious, traditional, one becomes; the further left, the more liberal, secular, and progressive.

Meanwhile, and here’s arguably the most misleading aspect of this paradigm, the middle of the line—the “centrist” position—becomes the default “middle ground,” the area where supposedly objective, non-ideologically charged people reside.

To a large extent, this paradigm is pure nonsense and exists only to legitimize falsehoods and corruption.  It is built atop an assumption—that there are no truths, or if there are, they are somewhere in the middle. Inasmuch as one veers to the right or left they become “extremists.”

As one example, consider the rise of gender confusion, if not hysteria, where “identifying” with either gender—or make believe genders—automatically makes one of that gender, and woe to whoever objects.  Anyone who refers to this development as “Leftist” unwittingly legitimizes it.  After all, and as seen in the current model, the Left, by its very nomenclature, is part of a legitimate spectrum of political views, no different than the Right.

Based on this model, people on the “Right,” who staunchly believe there are two, and only two, genders, are merely the polar opposites of those who believe in an infinite amount of genders.  Thus both deserve equal respect—equal legitimacy in the so-called discourse of ideas—certainly from the supposedly “objective” fellow in the “middle.”

In reality, there are only two genders—“Left/Right” constructs be damned.  Affirming this scientific fact is not a “Rightist” position.  It is a factual position.  Anything that diverges from it, by a little or by a lot, is wrong, unworthy of consideration or debate and deserving of zero legitimacy.  In this context, the Right is right, pure and simple; and everything that moves left of it is wrong.  That includes the squishy “Chamber of Commerce” Right and certainly the Center — to say nothing of the Left, where unadulterated madness reigns.

For people of faith, especially monotheists, understanding what is going on, and what words to use, should be especially simple.  After all, religions presuppose truths; that is what they are all about—offering a worldview based on truisms.

That truism may be that God created Adam and Eve or that homosexuality of any kind—even the by now banal man-on-man form—is a sin, literally, a missing of the mark, an error.  Whatever that religious truism is, going against it should not be seen by the faithful as an “alternate” position, one on a make believe line stretching from right to left, with each extreme having its own “logic.”

Rather, anything that diverges even a little from truth should be seen for what it is—a falsehood, a lie, an error.  In this more accurate context, those who howl about and spew gender nonsense can at last be seen for what they truly are: not “extreme Leftists,” but poor souls who suffer from insanity or possession. These descriptors may appear highly offensive—though no more offensive than the positions they describe—but at least they more accurately define what you’re really dealing with.

What about atheists and agnostics?  There was a time when, despite their personal beliefs (or lack thereof), their worldview was still permeated by a heritage of rational thinking and logic—a word, not coincidentally, derived from Logos—so that they could deny God but also deny the current madness of the age.  As time “progresses,” however, and as their connection to Logos becomes weaker and weaker, they, too, lose the ability to accept absolute truisms; and the current spirit of the age—“do what thou wilt”—becomes their default position.

Words matter; and the war on words is not limited to manipulating the meaning of man or woman, but rather manipulating people—including Christians and the ultra-conservative—into seeing politics through a so-called “Right/Left” prism.

So long as we continue to refer to madness or worse as “the Left,” so long will we continue to legitimize and give it a platform.  More accurate words are needed.   For people of faith who accept absolute truths in the realm of morality—or for people of reason who accept absolute facts in the realm of science—finding more accurate words should not be difficult.

When it comes to an increasing number of topics, there is no Right or Left; there is only Right or Wrong.  The sooner this is acknowledged, the sooner sanity will have a chance of prevailing.


Raymond Ibrahim

To read more articles by Raymond Ibrahim click here.

About the Author

Raymond Ibrahim

Raymond Ibrahim, author of the new book, Sword and Scimitar, Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West, is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Gatestone Institute, a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, and a Judith Rosen Friedman Fellow at the Middle East Forum.


Follow Raymond Ibrahim on TwitterandFacebook

Raymond Ibrahim archive articles.