The present migration crisis in Europe and the USA is being brought about by globalists operating on the Marxist principle of a worldwide redistribution of wealth, but at the same time a world controlled by powerful global economic interests. The result will be a dictatorship albeit not a dictatorship of the proletariat (yet, nevertheless, claiming to be in the name of the dispossessed). As under communism, personal possessions by the masses will be extremely limited or non-existent, and this will be accomplished in the name of the environment (“sustainability”).
The ruling “interests” supposedly will override the inherent selfishness of the West (but not their own selfishness). Western Civilization will no longer be the locus of economic domination. Under the new communist-inspired reductio, despite the political dissolution of colonialism, the West is still in charge of the world economy and thus continues to subordinate the interests of the second and third world countries to their own. According to the World Economic Forum (WEF) and to the pundits and second-rate minds that drafted the U.N. Agenda 2030 as well as pseudo-visionaries like George Soros, John Kerry, Greta Thunberg, Klaus Schwab, and Yuval Noah Harari, lead economist of the WEF, there is a racial component to economic domination that must be overcome and is linked to the economic dominance of Western Civilization over all other cultures in South America, Africa, and Asia.
The blaming of Western Civilization and American civilization for the poverty of the non-Western world is all part of the globalist propaganda machine. The flooding of third world immigrants into Europe and the USA is not just part of the “blame game,” but the money given to migrants will be sent back to their native countries and these funds are being encouraged by the lefties as partial reparations owing to capitalist, Western exploitation of the poorest people in the world. The premise is that their labor and natural resources have been making Western civ rich while consigning the LDC’s (less developed countries) to poverty. The huge migrations are part of supposedly “righting of this wrong” (of exploitation).
Yuval Harari is a “guru” of the World Economic Forum. The WEF wishes to bypass sovereign, national governments, both democratic and communist. Harari is especially known as a promoter of “inorganic life” which seems to mean robots or the robotization of humans. That is transhumanism — the merging of humans and machines, guided by the philosophy that humans themselves are nothing but machines, some being “useful” and others “useless eaters.” Harari has indicated that human history can be divided into Fascist, Communist, and Liberal. The Fascist was defeated in WWII, the Communist model tanked in 1990 with the collapse of the governmental system of the USSR, and now, with the advances in technology, liberalism no longer has a narrative.
By promoting transhumanism and AI solutions to humankind’s problems, an impersonal element is introduced into the equation. Supposed solutions reached by AI in dealing with various socio-economic problems such as food distribution, birth control, gender equality, proper respect for environmental resources, distribution of wealth, use of natural resources, and educational opportunities will be accomplished on a non-biased basis by AI. Presumably AI will prevent class exploitations since political and economic decisions will be made based on objective representations that properly balance resources with needs on a worldwide basis. Thus, supporters of technological direction for the globe seems to void all narratives about partisan political bias in decision-making. Presumably the idea of benefitting all through a master class of technocrats developing and using AI worldwide to meet all “needs” will eliminate all claims of governmental bias.
Yet, this theory advances the idea of communism, namely the ideal of the Rousseauian General Will as being pre-eminent in governance, which was the grandfather to the communist ideal of the good of all (not the utilitarian ideal of the greatest good of the greatest number) being pre-eminent. The communist ideal of the good of the proletariat being identifiable with the good of all is replaced by a more abstract algorithmic ideal of the good of all, yet both have the ideal of suppressing the individual.
The importance of the individual is a profoundly Christian ideal. Christianity is concerned about the potential eternal happiness of every individual based on his or her salvation in light of his or her relationship with Christ. Thus, the views of the WEF and the sustainability freaks who insist that we stop eating meat, stop driving gas-powered automobiles, stop using gas stoves, get used to living in smaller spaces and closer to our jobs, and stop making a big deal about the sanctity of male or female identity (which distracts from the supposedly more important issues of sustainability) are directly in opposition to the essence of Christianity. The globalist/environmentalist claim is that our relationship with the worldwide environment under the advanced auspices of computer- generated intelligence promises the most practical hope for all societies, and, following that, for each individual living in those societies. Christianity continues to offer life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as rights derived from Almighty God from which relationship and rights derive the real hope of the individual.
As Joshua said to his people after they had crossed the Jordan River into the Promised Land, “And if it is evil in your eyes to serve the Lord, choose this day whom you will serve, whether the gods… of the Amorites in whose land you dwell. But as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.” (Joshua 24: 15)
Jeffrey Ludwig
Photo: Flickr
To read more articles by Jeffrey Ludwig click here.